Urgent interdict filed to protect the Wild Coast against Shell’s seismic surveying
Share this article:
Technically Shell could start its seismic surveys on Wednesday, despite an urgent interdict to stop it being heard at 2 pm tomorrow.
Four environmental and human rights organisations - supported by environmental law firm, Cullinan & Associates - on Monday filed an urgent interim-interim interdict against Shell in the Eastern Cape Division of the Grahamstown High Court to prevent the fossil fuel company from commencing seismic testing along the ecologically diverse and sensitive marine environment of South Africa’s Wild Coast. The testing was due to start tomorrow, 1 December.
Cullinan & Associates delivered a certificate of urgency to the Registrar yesterday and Acting Judge Govindjee’s Directive was received at around 14h20, which saw the matter as urgent.
Shell has til 4pm on Tuesday to deliver notice of opposition and answering affidavit and the applicants have until 1 pm tomorrow to deliver replying affidavit, if any.
Read the latest Simply Green digital magazine below
Applicants and (opposing) Respondents to file heads by 1 pm tomorrow, 1 December.
The papers were filed at the High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Division, Grahamstown, and served electronically on Shell’s attorneys on 29 November 2021.
The matter will be heard in Grahamstown and argued virtually.
The applicants are Border Deep Sea Angling Association, Kei Mouth Ski Boat Club, Natural Justice and Greenpeace Africa.
The applicants intend to put expert evidence before the court to expose how “irrational and socially unjust” it is for Shell to continue looking for more oil and gas reserves when the reserves already discovered cannot be used without causing catastrophic climate change, especially in light of the Dutch court ruling ordering Shell to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 47% within this decade.
The applicants said their view is that the commencement of the seismic exploration activities are prima facie unlawful until Shell has applied for, and obtained, the necessary Environmental Authorisation in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA).
“We also believe that the decision-making process amounts to unjust administrative action since interested and affected parties were not informed of the granting of the exploration right or given an opportunity to appeal it. The public was also not notified of the two applications to renew the exploration right.”
They said the vessel would, for five months, fire air guns every 10 seconds through 6 011km² of the ocean surface, firing extremely loud shock wave emissions that penetrate through 3km of water and 40km into the Earth’s crust below the seabed. Marine life on the sensitive Wild Coast would be disturbed and destroyed with many sea creatures like whales, dolphins, seals, penguins, sharks and even crabs and tiny shellfish being negatively impacted by the blasts in the coming months.
The Wild Coast’s pristine beaches and biodiversity attract millions of tourists every year. Seismic surveys have been linked to decreased sightings of marine life and decreased catch rates for commercial fishing.
The planned seismic survey and planned activity thereafter will have direct and dire impacts on the social, economic and cultural rights, and ultimately the right to self-determination of the communities of eXolobeni, Nqamakwe and Port Saint Johns, which depend heavily on eco-tourism and fishing for livelihoods and subsistence, and who safeguard this land as sacred and deeply connected to their identity and heritage, they said.
The needs and rights of these communities, the stewards of our seas, land and biodiversity, far outweigh the selfish interests of companies like Shell.
The mitigation measures proposed by Shell are wholly inadequate for South Africa’s most diverse coastline and will cause irreparable harm to whales, dolphins, crayfish, endemic reef fish, fish larvae, turtles, birdlife and zooplankton. Many listed as Threatened and Protected Species are located directly within the survey area. Shell’s own documents state that the surveys should not take place in December due to migratory whales (now in calf) traversing the area.
“This flies in the face of the government's responsibility to protect and safeguard human rights and the environment. It also undermines our government’s obligation under the Paris Climate Agreement to mitigate the climate crisis for people now, and for future generations, and contradicts the commitments made at the recent COP26 in Glasgow to lower emissions and advance a just transition,” says Pooven Moodley, NJ Executive Director.
John Luef, Border Deep Sea Angling Association, another applicant said “ ludicrous that this is even being considered as an option by our government to look for gas and oil reserves in an evolving 'greener' world in any of our coastal waters, let alone the extremely biodiverse and sensitive Wild Coast. We will not take this lying down and will do all in our power to put a stop to it.” -
"Shell's activities threaten to destroy the Wild Coast and the lives of the people living there. We know that Shell is a climate criminal, destroying people's lives and the planet for profit. South Africa's problems do not require violent extraction or destruction of the environment and community livelihoods. The best and most immediate solution is a just transition to renewable energy, ensuring safe and decent/work jobs, and energy access for all,” says Happy Khambule, Senior Climate and Energy Campaign Manager for Greenpeace Africa.
Read the latest Home Improver's digital magazine below